All submitted manuscripts will undergo a two-stage review process in accordance with the conference review algorithm.

At the first stage, each manuscript is subject to preliminary editorial screening. This includes an assessment of its compliance with the conference scope, formal submission requirements, academic language standards, manuscript structure, and publication ethics. The manuscript is also checked for textual similarity using anti-plagiarism software.

At the second stage, manuscripts that pass the preliminary screening are sent for expert review. The final decision on acceptance, revision, or rejection is based on the reviewers’ recommendations and the editorial assessment of the manuscript’s academic quality.

 

Acceptance decisions will take into account the following criteria

Originality — the manuscript presents a new idea, research problem, methodological approach, empirical evidence, theoretical argument, or a new interpretation of existing knowledge.

Relevance — the manuscript corresponds to the scientific scope of the conference and addresses one or more of its key thematic areas.

Significance — the study raises issues that are important for sustainable development, green taxonomy, green technologies, green economy, environmental transformation, ESG, or related interdisciplinary fields.

Scientific quality — the arguments are supported by sufficient data, appropriate methods, relevant literature, and a clearly presented research design.

Technical and methodological rigor — the research methods are selected, justified, and applied correctly; the results are properly substantiated and clearly interpreted.

Theoretical or practical contribution — the manuscript contributes to the development of scientific knowledge and/or offers findings that may have practical relevance for policy, business, technology, environmental management, or sustainable development.

Clarity of presentation — the research aim, structure, argumentation, results, and conclusions are presented logically and are easily understood by the academic audience.

Academic integrity — the manuscript complies with the principles of responsible authorship, proper citation, transparency of data use, and publication ethics.

 

Anti-Plagiarism Check

 

Reviewers and editors may have access to the manuscript similarity report generated by anti-plagiarism software.

The similarity report includes all textual elements of the manuscript, including references, affiliations, standard terminology, methodological descriptions, and other formal sections. Therefore, the similarity percentage should not be interpreted as a fully objective measure of the originality or academic quality of the manuscript.

The final assessment of originality is made by the editors and reviewers on the basis of a qualitative analysis of the similarity report, the nature of textual overlaps, the correctness of citation, and the scientific contribution of the manuscript.

 

Revision Procedure

If revisions are requested, authors are expected to revise the manuscript in accordance with the reviewers’ comments and submit the revised version through the online submission system.

The revised manuscript should normally be submitted within one week after receiving the reviewers’ comments, unless another deadline is specified by the Organizing Committee or the Publication Committee.

Authors should ensure that all reviewer comments are addressed carefully and that the revised manuscript complies with the conference submission guidelines.

 

Essential Evaluation Criteria

During the review process, particular attention will be given to the following criteria:

• The manuscript fully corresponds to the conference scope and matches its key topics.

• The level of English meets the requirements for academic publications.

• The title is accurate, informative, and reflects the content of the manuscript.

• The abstract is logically structured and clearly presents the aim, methods, results, and conclusions of the study.

• The keywords provide a clear understanding of the manuscript’s subject area.

• The introduction clearly defines the research problem and demonstrates the relevance of the study.

• The literature review reflects the current state of research and identifies the research gap.

• The research methods are appropriate, justified, and correctly applied.

• The results are properly substantiated, clearly presented, and logically interpreted.

• The conclusions are supported by the research results and formulated in an objective and balanced manner.

• The reference list is prepared correctly; the sources are relevant, up to date, and sufficiently representative.

• The manuscript meets all submission requirements concerning structure, formatting, and academic presentation.

• The manuscript demonstrates scientific originality and makes a clear contribution to the relevant field of research.

• The study has prospects for further academic development.

• The results of the study may have theoretical, methodological, policy-related, technological, environmental, or practical application.

 

Editorial Decision

Based on the review results, the manuscript may receive one of the following decisions:

• accepted without revision;

• accepted subject to minor revision;

• reconsidered after major revision;

• rejected.

The final publication decision is made by the editors and the conference publication team after considering the reviewers’ recommendations, the quality of the revised manuscript, and its compliance with the conference requirements.

 

© 2024-2026